Legal Opinion

Rothrock v. Hamlin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 28, 1927No. 11,533Published

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and defendant in' error was defendant, in the trial court, and we hereinafter so refer to them. April 1, 1916, they formed a partnership for the practice of law with offices in Colorado Springs. This partnership was dissolved October 1,1922, at the request of defendant, but by mutual agreement. Almost two years later plaintiff sued for an accounting, claiming more than $20,000. Defendant denied and set up a counterclaim of approximately $2,000. Trial was to the court, whose findings were, in the main, for defendant. Certain minor claims of plaintiff were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Felt v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Stuart v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API