Carr v. . Coke
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
AVERY and CLARK, JJ., dissent, arguendo. The plaintiff, as a citizen and taxpayer of the State, brings this action against the defendant as Secretary of State, who by virtue of his office is the custodian of all acts passed by the Legislature, or which purports to have been passed, whose duty it is to deliver certified copies of said acts to the Public Printer for publication.
The prayer is that the defendant show cause why a peremptory mandamus shall not issue to compel him to remove the act under consideration from his files, and why he should not be enjoined from delivering a certified copy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Ex parte WrenMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
- State Ex Rel. Scarborough v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Boyd v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- DeLoach v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Coler v. Board of Com'rs of Stanly CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1898
- Price v. City of MoundsvilleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.