Mims v. Edgefield County Water & Sewer Authority
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellant alleges the circuit court erred by declaring unenforceable a fee charged to respondent. We agree and reverse.
Respondent operates a retirement home located within appellant’s service area. Respondent’s building contains a fire sprinkler system consisting of 350 sprinkler heads. Appellant adopted a rate ordinance which provided for a sprinkler head charge on all fire sprinkler systems of $2.00 per sprinkler head per year. In 1978, respondent paid under protest appellant’s fee. After exhausting her administrative remedies, respondent initiated this action seeking a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Palmetto Dunes Resort v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- May v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- S.C. Elec. v. RandallDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
- Richtex Corp. v. PilkingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- May v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983