Legal Opinion

Richtex Corp. v. Pilkington

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 7, 1983No. 21869PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is an action for specific performance of an option to purchase. The trial court, without a jury, concluded the interest should be computed on the balance remaining unpaid in each year of the agreement, and held respondent was due $26,603.19 under the contract. We disagree and reverse.

Respondent’s predecessor in interest leased certain property to appellant’s predecessor in interest with an option to *636purchase for $70,000.00. The provisions concerning the amount due respondent upon appellant’s exercise of the option stated:

“(1) The Six Thousand ($6,000.00) Dollars this date…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Mims v. Edgefield County Water & Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. May v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. May v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API