Richtex Corp. v. Pilkington
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
This is an action for specific performance of an option to purchase. The trial court, without a jury, concluded the interest should be computed on the balance remaining unpaid in each year of the agreement, and held respondent was due $26,603.19 under the contract. We disagree and reverse.
Respondent’s predecessor in interest leased certain property to appellant’s predecessor in interest with an option to *636purchase for $70,000.00. The provisions concerning the amount due respondent upon appellant’s exercise of the option stated:
“(1) The Six Thousand ($6,000.00) Dollars this date…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Mims v. Edgefield County Water & Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- May v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- May v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983