Legal Opinion
Car-Freshner Corporation v. Marlenn Products Company
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 30, 1960No. Civ. A. 10830PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
This suit involves separate counts for technical trade-mark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq., and for unfair competition due to the manufacture and sale by defendant of a small tree shaped figure of blotter stock material impregnated with a deodorant. An answer was filed by defendant denying any exclusive right of the-plaintiff to the tree shaped figure so impregnated; and two counterclaims were filed by defendant; one requesting the-cancellation of plaintiff’s trade-mark registration because it was improperly granted and…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gai Audio of New York, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Extra Special Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. North American Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Car-Freshner Corp. v. Auto Aid Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1978
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.