Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Burlington Industries, Inc. (hereinafter called Burlington) asks further eonsideration of its motion for summary judgment that U. S. Patent No. 3,117,361 is not infringed by the use of “false twist” (hereinafter designated FT) machines, manufactured by Ateliers Roannais de Constructions Textiles (hereinafter called ARCT-France) and sold by ARCT, Inc., Greensboro, North Carolina, a U. S. subsidiary of ARCTFrance.
THE CHARGE OF INFRINGEMENT
The patent under scrutiny, attached as Appendix A of this order,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Keystone Driller Co. v. Northwest Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Entron on Maryland, Inc. v. Jerrold Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Coleco Industries, Inc. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Black & Decker Mfg. v. Ever-Ready ApplianceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1981
- Saturn Manufacturing, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Williams Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co. And Robert M. Williams, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Fred Whitaker Company v. E. T. Barwick Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.