Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Art Galleries v. Fatzie
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 1990No. Case C-890726PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendants-appellants Donald F. Fatzie ("Fatzie") and Donzico Antiques and Imports ("Donzico"), appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Cincinnati Art Galleries. The decision of the trial court is affirmed as modified.
In May of 1988, Fatzie noticed in a trade magazine an advertisement in which the plaintiff, an art gallery, sought to purchase the work of various artists Fatzie telephoned the plaintiff and offered to sell it an original watercolor painting by F. S. Cozzens, one of the artists specified in the advertisement. The plaintiff was interested in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Charles R. Combs Trucking, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lambert v. ShearerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Delaney v. Skyline Lodge, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Snyder Computer Systems, Inc. v. StivesOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Estate of Poole v. GrosserOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Krutowsky v. SimonsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.