Legal Opinion

Ehnes v. Mang

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1951No. Appeal, No. 139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This appeal is from an order opening a judgment entered upon a warrant of attorney contained. in. a judgment note.

*156On January 10, 1950, Fred C. Ehnes, appellant, caused a judgment to be entered against Samuel R. Mang, appellee, by virtue of a warrant of attorney to confess judgment contained in a promissory note under seal dated August 20, 1932, in the amount of $288 together with interest and collection fees, or a total of $631.77. On March 11, 1950, defendant filed his petition to open judgment interposing the defenses of forgery, fraud, error, payment, invalid…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Oppenheimer v. ShapiroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Tilghman v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  4. Diamond v. TobiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  5. Lerch Hardware Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Budget Charge Accounts, Inc. v. MullaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API