Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. Shapiro
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 16, 1948No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Pine, J.,
Morton A. Oppenheimer, Herman L. Wexler and Ruth M. Oppenheimer, co-partners, trading as A. E. Oppenheimer & Bro., appeal from an order making absolute a rule to open judgment contending that no depositions were taken regarding an issue of fact raised by the petition and answer.
Appellants, on November 5, 1945, filed their statement of claim in assumpsit against Harold Shapiro, appellee, claiming $2,202.00 as damages for breach of an agreement for the sale of certain merchandise. On December 21, 1945, the court made absolute a rule to require appellants to file a more…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Berkowitz v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Pinsky v. MasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Warnock Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- National Finance Corp. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Downes v. HODINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Britton v. Continental Mining & Smelting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- TOPLOVICH v. SPITMANSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Brown & Bigelow, Inc. v. BorishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Day v. Wilkie Buick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.