Legal Opinion

Redinbo v. Fretz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1884No. 10,606PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Zoleaes, J. —

The proceedings in this case, so far' as they are material upon this appeal, were had under the code of 1852. That code, therefore, must control in the decision of the questions in controversy. In appellant’s complaint below he charged that he had been a partner with appellees in the ownership and operation of a flouring mill, and other partnership property •, that they had dissolved the partnership, taken possession of the partnership property and excluded him from the use and enjoyment of the same, and wrongfully converted to their own use money and other assets of the firm.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Doctor v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Young v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Lake Erie, Wabash & St. Louis Railroad v. HeathIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Allen v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Chandler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bowen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hall v. DurhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API