Pitts v. Monaco Coach Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BELL, Chief Judge.
This is an action for breach of warranty and other claims arising out of the purchase of a motor home. Defendants have filed a motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons that follow Defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I
On March 1, 2003, Plaintiff James Reed Pitts purchased a new 2001 Holiday Rambler Motor Home from Defendant George Ewing, Inc. (“George Ewing”) for approximately $70,000. The motor home was manufactured by Defendant Monaco Coach Corporation (“Monaco”). The motor home came with warranties from Monaco, Ford Motor…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alvery Pack v. Damon Corporation, General R v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Wright v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015
- Harnden v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Harnden v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.