Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Stewart (In Re Pearson)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 28, 2008No. BAP No. WY-07-097. Bankruptcy No. 06-20528PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*709McFEELEY, Chief Judge.
Debtors/Appellants Jimmy Dean and Jeannette Lucille Pearson (“Debtors”) appeal a Confirmation Order of their Third Amended Plan entered by the bankruptcy court for the District of Wyoming. The Debtors argue that the bankruptcy court erred when it denied confirmation of their First Amended Plan on the grounds that under the means test they had wrongfully claimed a vehicle acquisition allowance for two vehicles. We agree with the Debtors that the means test allows a debtor to take the full vehicle ownership/lease expense deduction even when the debtor’s vehicle is…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ross-Tousey v. NearyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Giesbrecht v. Fitzgerald (In Re Giesbrecht)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Tate v. BolenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- In Re RalstonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- In Re YoungUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.