Legal Opinion
In Re Young
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 8, 2008No. 19-10442PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
WILLIAM HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The matters before the Court are the Objection to Confirmation of Amended Chapter 13 Plan filed by eCAST Settlement Corporation (“eCAST”), as an agent for FIA Card Services, a/k/a Bank of America (the “Objection”), and the Response filed by Darrin W. Young (the “Debtor”). eCAST objects to the Debtor’s plan asserting, inter alia, that the Debtor has understated his projected disposable income by claiming expense deductions on Form 22C to which he is not entitled. For the reasons set forth below, I will enter an order…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Coffin v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Coffin)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2010
- In Re BurbankUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009
- In Re O'Neill MirandaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- In Re PearlUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- In Re MarshallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.