Legal Opinion

Sheldon v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 13, 1917No. 1711PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 39365.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The importations now in question were invoiced as betel nuts, and were entered for duty under the tariff act of 1913.

The collector assessed duty upon them as huts at the rate of 1 cent per pound under the provision for “nuts of all kinds, shelled or unshelled, not specially provided dor,” contained in paragraph 226 of the act.

The importers protested, claiming free entry for the merchandise as crude drugs under paragraph 477, with an alternative claim for assessment at 10 per cent ad valorem as nonenumerated articles under paragraph 385 of the act.

The protest was submitted to the Board of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. United States v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. United States v. Morimura Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Stern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  5. O. G. Hempstead & Son v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. BartiromoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Wooster Brush Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API