Legal Opinion

HIEN NGUYEN v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 2009No. COA08-1469PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where plaintiffs appeal an interlocutory order that does not contain a Rule 54(b) certification and fail to show a substantial right will be adversely affected if the order is not immediately reviewed, the appeal is dismissed.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On 28 October 2005, Jayceon Taylor a/k/a the rap artist “The Game” (Taylor) was scheduled to perform a concert in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Earlier that day, Taylor and his entourage visited the Four Seasons Mall in Greensboro. During this visit, a member of Taylor’s entourage carried a video camera and recorded…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Renwick v. News & Observer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Ellis v. Northern Star Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Blackwelder v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. HIEN NGUYEN v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Greenbrier Place, LLC v. Baldwin Design ConsultantsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  5. Greenbrier Place, LLC v. Baldwin Design ConsultantsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API