Legal Opinion

Rich, Rich & Nance v. Carolina Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 2002No. COA00-96-2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Carolina Construction Corporation (“defendant”) appeals from a judgment by the trial court awarding monetary damages to Rich, Rich & Nance (“plaintiff’) for breach of a real estate sales contract. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*151The pertinent facts of this appeal are as follows: Plaintiff, a North Carolina general partnership, owned an 11.89-acre parcel of land known as “Walking Horse Subdivision” in Elizabeth City, North Carolina. On 29 August 1994, plaintiff entered into a contract with LFM Properties (“LFM”) to sell this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Clement v. ClementSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Barnhardt v. City of KannapolisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Kent Corporation v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Finkel v. Palm Park, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API