Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Smith

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 11, 1993No. 1:10-adr-00010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DEVINE, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs Carol A. Rubin and her daughter, Rebecca B. Rubin, bring this action against defendants Philip Smith, Sr., Fred Rheault, James Ross, the Town of Salem, New Hampshire, Dan Stebbens, John Ragaz-zi, Harvey Rubin, and Quentin Rubin. The plaintiffs allege that Rebecca Rubin was taken from Carol Rubin by the defendants in violation of plaintiffs’ federally protected rights. Plaintiffs claim that they were denied their right of access to the courts and deprived of both the right to equal protection under the law and a constitutionally protected liberty…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Egervary v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Guillemard Gionorio v. Contreras GomezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
  4. Office of Child Advocate v. LindgrenDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Trimble v. Androscoggin Valley Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API