Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the Treasury
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
Appellants in this litigation are 13 major oil companies that do business in the State of New Jersey. They are subject to New Jersey’s Corporation Business Tax. They also are subject to the federal windfall profit tax imposed on producers of crude oil. None of appellants’ oil production takes place in New Jersey.
Each appellant has sought to deduct its federal windfall profit tax in calculating “entire net income” for purposes of the New Jersey Corporation Business Tax. Under the applicable New Jersey statute, however, a corporation may not deduct a federal tax that is “on or measured by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.