Legal Opinion
United States v. Traficant
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 25, 2002No. 4:01CR207PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT TRAFICANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
WELLS, District Judge.
A jury found Defendant Traficant guilty of counts one through ten of the superseding indictment on 11 April 2002. (Docket # 341). On 22 April 2002, Defendant Traf-icant filed a timely motion for a new trial. (Docket # 347). That same day, a supplemental memorandum to the motion for a new trial was filed on Congressman Trail- cant’s behalf by Attorneys Percy Squire and Lloyd Pierre-Louis. 1 (Docket # 349). The United States responded to the arguments made in the original motion for a new…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Tremblay, 97-1816 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- United States v. GouldDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007