Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Harrell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1928No. 13,192PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

On January 12, 1915, a promissory note for $100, payable to Harry E. Harrell, appellee herein, was executed by appellant William R. Hunter, a resident of Marion county, as principal, and by Lillie L. Hunter, a resident of Shelby county, as surety. The note not having been paid when due, an action was commenced by Harrell in the Shelby Circuit Court against the payors to enforce collection. Lillie L. Hunter, having been served with process, pleaded suretyship, setting forth that she was a married woman at the time she executed the note. The record in the case shows appearance of William R.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ambler v. WhippleIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Shultz v. ShultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hollinger v. ReemeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Corbitt v. TimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Marion, Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armes v. the Pierce Governor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Community Care Centers, Inc. v. SullivanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Vail v. Department of Financial InstitutionsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Garrett v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway FordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API