Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Shultz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1894No. 16,554PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The circuit court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and the appellant declining to amend or plead further, appellee had judgment upon the demurrer.

The only question presented by the assignment of errors is the correctness of that ruling.

The substance of the complaint is as follows:

Maria Shultz complains of Charles Shultz, Henry Struckman and Margaret Roeger, and says that on the -day of March, 1859, she was married to the above defendant, Charles Shultz, and plaintiff and said defendant lived together as husband and wife until eight years-before the filing of this complaint, the marital…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Nealis v. DicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hogg v. LinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Klein v. WhiteheadCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Harchenko v. HarchenkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Fishman v. AlbertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Gerini v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API