Legal Opinion
Seaman v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 7, 2002No. 01-71871PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF ANTOINETTE SEAMAN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT DIANN JOHNSON’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BORMAN, District Judge. '
Before the Court are two motions, Plaintiff Antoinette Seaman’s motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # 16), and Defendant Diann Johnson’s motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # 22). The Court heard oral argument on December 18, 2001. Upon consideration of the motions, the submissions of the parties, and the applicable law, the Court will GRANT Defendant Diann Johnson’s motion, and DENY Plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1341, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23937j Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Julie A. Marsh, Dana Lyn Weaver and James R. Marsh, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Forcier Ex Rel. Estate of Forcier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Seaman v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004