Forcier Ex Rel. Estate of Forcier v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This case is a procedural motley presenting a set of curious questions about the respective roles of insurance earners and federal courts under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. When all is said and done, the appeal that we must decide turns on the parties’ agreeable acquiescence in the district court’s assumption of the insurer’s wonted role. The tale follows.
We assume the reader’s familiarity with the district court’s exegetic account of the relevant background, see Forcier ex rel. Forcier v. Forcier, 406 F.Supp.2d 132…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mr. I. Ex Rel. L.I. v. Maine School Administrative District No. 55Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Bard v. Boston Shipping Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Sullivan v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Amyndas Pharmaceuticals, S.A. v. Zealand Pharma A/SCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.