Legal Opinion
Savchuk v. Rush
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 10, 1976No. 45556PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
245 N.W.2d 624 (1976)
Jeffrey D. SAVCHUK, Respondent,
v.
Randal RUSH and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, garnishee, Appellants.
No. 45556.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
September 10, 1976.
Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan, O. C. Adamson, II, and James F. Roegge, Minneapolis, for appellants.
Schermer, Schwappach, Borkon & Ramstead and John D. Mariani and Richard I. Diamond, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Heard before SHERAN, C.J., and OTIS, TODD, MacLAUGHLIN, and SCOTT, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
Appeal by…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Seider v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Fraley v. Estate of OedingOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Belcher v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Anderson v. LuitjensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.