Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Strassner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1893No. 16,252PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Coffey, O. J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages sustained by the appellee on account of a personal injury suffered by reason of a defective and unsafe sidewalk. No question is made as to the sufficiency of the pleadings in the cause. A trial by a jury resulted in a verdict for the appellee, upon which the court, over a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment.

The assignment of error calls in question the correctness of the ruling of the circuit court in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new trial.

It is contended by the appellant that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Garfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Woollen v. WhitacreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Finch v. BerginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Newman v. HazelriggIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Scott County School District One v. Asher Ex Rel. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Indianapolis v. KeeleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. O'ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Abbitt v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. HICKEY, ETC. v. ShoemakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API