Legal Opinion
De Mayo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1929No. 8315, 8316PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
These cases come to us both on writ of error and on appeal. Appeal is the proper procedure under existing law, and the writ of error is dismissed.
This appeal is from a conviction in the District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma upon an indictment containing four counts; the first, for conspiracy, and the other three for the substantive offenses of introducing intoxicating liquor unlawfully from without the state of Oklahoma into that part of the state which was formerly Indian Territory. The destination was Tulsa. The conspiracy is charged against one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Fiman v. State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- State v. JansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- People v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- South Dakota v. FimanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1927
3Cited by16 opinions
- George Leslie Samuels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- People v. Tom Cheng Hsang LiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Tingle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.