Legal Opinion

People v. Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, George E. Mills, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, rendered on the 27th day óf May, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree.*

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J. :

The notice of appeal herein purports to be an appeal from a, judgment convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the’Second degree. lío such judgment of conviction was entered in this case, nor was there any indictment or verdict upon which it could be based, but as the notice of appeal also specifies that it is from each and every part of the judgment which was rendered it is perhaps sufficient. The People raised no point in respect thereto and we consider the case upon the assumption that the notice of appeal is sufficient to bring up the judgment and the record…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People of the State of N.Y. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Andrews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. People v. . BlivenNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. People v. . LaurenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RollingNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. MantisIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. AshworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. De Mayo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. People v. ConradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API