Legal Opinion

South Dakota v. Fiman

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided September 2, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIOTT, District Judge.

I have resolved the issues -in re State of South Dakota, plaintiff, v. Chas. F. Fiman, as receiver, ete., in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

The plaintiff seeks by this action to establish a trust ex maleficio in rural credit moneys alleged to belong to the plaintiff, deposited by it in the National Bank of Commerce of Pierre, S. D., in excess of the limit fixed .by statute for such deposits. The defendant receiver in his answer admits, in substance, that the moneys of the plaintiff were deposited in the bank in violation of the provisions of the Rural…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gibbons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fiman v. State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. De Mayo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API