Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Lindsey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1934No. 5 Div. 161PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Appellant, having been removed as one of the eoexeeutors of the estate of his father, J. B. F. Lindsey, was brought to a final settlement in the probate court.

The present appeal is from the decree on such settlement. '

The order of removal was affirmed on appeal. Lindsey v. Lindsey et al., 226 Ala. 489, 147 So. 425. A reference to that decision will disclose the issue there tried involved the validity of a cheek, purporting to have been given by the decedent to appellant for $8,000, and on which appellant had drawn from the bank said sum during his father’s lifetime. It was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Miller v. Irby's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Wright v. LangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Childress v. ChildressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  5. McGowan v. MilnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. De Moville v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Adams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API