Hanyok v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, P. L. 736, as amended by the Act of 1939, P. L. 520, which was in force when the claimant’s accidental injury occurred, contains in section 306(e) the following provision: “If the employee shall refuse reasonable surgical, medical and hospital services, treatment, medicines and supplies, tendered to him by his employer, he shall forfeit all rights to compensation for any injury or any increase in his incapacity shown to have resulted from such refusal.”
The meaning of this clause, as originally enacted 1 was passed upon by us and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parlovich v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Neary v. Philadelphia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- O'Toole v. Hughes-Foulkrod Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Neary v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joyce Western Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Bostic v. DREHERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Visnic v. Westmoreland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.