Legal Opinion

In Re Purifiner Distribution Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided April 11, 1995No. Bankruptcy 94-05637-8G1Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION OF T/F SYSTEMS, INC. FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

(Supersedeas Bond)

PAUL M. GLENN, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS CASE came on for consideration on the Motion of T/F Systems, Inc. for Relief from Automatic Stay pursuant to § 362(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. T/F Systems, Inc. (“T/F” or “Movant”) requests that the auto'matic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) be lifted to clarify that the Movant is permitted to execute on a civil supersedeas bond to the extent of the monetary obligations of Purifi-ner Distribution Corporation (the “Debtor” or “Purifiner”) to the Movant as determined in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Matter of Celotex Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
  3. Bennie Edwards and Joann Edwards v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., the Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Robert J. Sheldon and Joan M. Sheldon, Doing Business as World Bazaar of Southlake v. Munford, Inc. And Lee Wards Creative Crafts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Mid-Jersey National Bank v. Fidelity-Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API