Legal Opinion
Mid-Jersey National Bank v. Fidelity-Mortgage Investors
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 16, 1975No. Nos. 74-1544, 74-1545PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
These appeals confront us with a novel procedural issue regarding the scope of Bankruptcy Rule 11 — 44 as well as questions pertaining to a summary judgment in favor of a bank, and pre- and post-judgment interest on that judgment.
Before we may consider the merits of the appeal and cross-appeal in this matter, it is necessary first to determine whether under Bankruptcy Rule 11-44 the filing of a Chapter XI petition operates to stay the appeals.
*642A.
Plaintiff, Mid-Jersey National Bank (hereinafter Mid-Jersey), is a National Banking Association with its…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Phelps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- John Agnew Co. v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sun Ship, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Matson Navigation Co., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- WW Gay Mech. Contr., Inc. v. Wharfside Two, Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Coleco Industries, Inc. v. BermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Matter of Canarico Quarries, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
- Matter of Celotex Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.