Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Enimpah, A.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
Does a motion to suppress evidence demand proof by the accused of a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area in which the evidence is found before the Commonwealth’s burden of production is triggered? Here, the Commonwealth refused to present any evidence at appellee’s suppression hearing, claiming its obligation was not in force until appellee *361met this “threshold” burden. The trial court accordingly suppressed the evidence; the Superior Court affirmed. We affirm that decision and reiterate that which should now be clear: “In all cases, the burden of production is […
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Jacoby, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Shabezz, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. Leed, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. Fant, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.