Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Enimpah, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2014No. 84 MAP 2013PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

Does a motion to suppress evidence demand proof by the accused of a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area in which the evidence is found before the Commonwealth’s burden of production is triggered? Here, the Commonwealth refused to present any evidence at appellee’s suppression hearing, claiming its obligation was not in force until appellee *361met this “threshold” burden. The trial court accordingly suppressed the evidence; the Superior Court affirmed. We affirm that decision and reiterate that which should now be clear: “In all cases, the burden of production is […

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Jacoby, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Shabezz, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. Leed, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. Fant, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API