Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weston v. Weston

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1925No. 24,478PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

Wilson, O. J.

(dissenting.)

I cannot concur.(1) The definite instructions that the deed was to be delivered upon the death of the grantor bring this case within the doctrine of Hagen v. Hagen, 136 Minn. 121, 161 N. W. 380, L. R. A. 1917C, 964, and Ingersoll v. Odendahl, 136 Minn. 428, 162 N. W. 525. The rights of the parties were fixed by the delivery of the deed. Such is the positive and undisputed evidence. To my mind there is nothing surprising in the decedent being satisfied with a life estate which the deed transaction reserved to him. His expression of satisfaction of being “through with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. OdendahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Hagen v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weston v. WestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API