Legal Opinion

Brown v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 13, 2001No. 115, 2000PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice.

The pivotal issue in this case is the admissibility of hearsay evidence. Here, the trial judge excluded evidence of a physician’s office notation offered by a patient-claimant for the purpose of showing that the claimant’s insurer refused in bad faith to pre-authorize a necessary medical procedure. Having excluded this crucial evidence for the claimant’s intended purpose while admitting it for other limited purposes that were not applicable to support a finding of bad faith refusal to authorize required medical treatment, the Superior Court entered judgment as a matter…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. United States v. John SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Margaret Sharon Worsham v. A.H. Robins CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Gannett Co., Inc. v. KanagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  2. Spencer v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. Mammarella v. EvantashSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  4. Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Kardos v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API