Legal Opinion

Thompson v. House, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 29, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1942Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA QUANSA THOMPSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 09-1942 (BAH) LINDA AND A., INC t/a THE HOUSE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Five exotic dancers brought this action against the owners and operators of “The House,” “an exotic gentlemen’s club in Washington, D.C. featuring nude female dancers.” Mem. in Supp. of Pls.’ Mot. for Partial Summ. J. (“Pls.’ Mem.”) at 1. The House classified its dancers as independent contractors, rather than employees, and, accordingly, did not pay them minimum wage. The plaintiffs argue that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Tao v. FreehCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. W. J. Usery, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. Pilgrim Equipment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API