Legal Opinion

Weissblum v. MOSTAFZAFAN FOUND. OF NEW YORK

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Defendant seeks to reargue our recent decision (59 NY2d 815) in this case whereby we decided that the rule of Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594) and Eaton v Equitable Life Assur. Soc. (56 NY2d 900) should be applied to preclude defendant from vacating a default judgment entered against it for failing, as a result of law office failure, to timely file an answer.

Subsequent to our disposition of the liability question in this case, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law a new section 2005 to the CPLR which allows the lower courts to exercise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Weissblum v. Mostafzafan FoundationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pettinato v. Sunscape At Bay Shore Home Owners Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Alternative Automotive, Inc. v. MowbrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Ruotolo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1991
  4. 78/79 York Associates v. RandCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
  5. Q.P.I. Restaurants Ltd. v. SlevinNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API