Legal Opinion
Weissblum v. Mostafzafan Foundation
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 7, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion to vacate its *817default denied and question certified answered in the negative for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Arthur Markewich at the Appellate Division (90 AD2d 741).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, and Simons.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Weissblum v. MOSTAFZAFAN FOUND. OF NEW YORKNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Weissblum v. Mostafzafan FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983