Legal Opinion

Weissblum v. Mostafzafan Foundation

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion to vacate its *817default denied and question certified answered in the negative for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Arthur Markewich at the Appellate Division (90 AD2d 741).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, and Simons.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weissblum v. MOSTAFZAFAN FOUND. OF NEW YORKNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Weissblum v. Mostafzafan FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Kane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983