Legal Opinion

Alternative Automotive, Inc. v. Mowbray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment was denied by Special Term on constraint of Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594) and Eaton v Equitable Life Assur. Soc. (56 NY2d 900). A subsequent statutory amendment restored discretion to excuse default based on law office failure (see L 1983, ch 318). The new law applies to all cases still pending before a court (Weissblum v Mostafzafan Foundation, 60 NY2d 637). The reasons for the brief default herein were excusable, and questions of fact suggesting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Weissblum v. MOSTAFZAFAN FOUND. OF NEW YORKNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vierya v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Calaci v. Allied Interstate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. A.M. Medical Services, P.C. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010
  4. CALACI, APRYL v. ALLIED INTERSTATE, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Calaci v. Allied Interstate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API