Legal Opinion

Waller v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 28, 1976PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SANDERS, Judge.

Plaintiffs have appealed from a Chancery decree denying their application for an injunction to enjoin the Defendants from violating restrictive covenants of a subdivision.

The Plaintiffs-Appellants, Hubert D. Waller, Lynn Leopper and Kenneth Yar-nell, filed suit in the Chancery Court of Knox County against the Defendants-Ap-pellees, Jack E. Thomas and wife, Blanche Thomas. The suit seeks to enjoin the Defendants from operating a beauty salon in their home, allegedly in violation of certain restrictive covenants imposed on the lots in the subdivision in which both the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Roberts v. RayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  3. Lowe v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Carr v. TrivettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  5. Cesar v. VirginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Parks v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  3. Arthur v. Lake Tansi Village, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Richards v. Abbottsford Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. Grand Valley Lakes Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Dennis BurrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API