Legal Opinion
Richards v. Abbottsford Homeowners Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided December 28, 1990PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOCH, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a dispute concerning the assessment of maintenance fees at an exclusive planned unit development in Nashville. The owners of a home built on two consolidated lots filed an action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County, seeking a declaration that the development’s restrictive covenants did not permit the homeowners’ association to assess a maintenance fee on each lot. The *194trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the homeowners were required to pay maintenance fees on both lots because they had not obtained the homeowners’ association’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ballard v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Land Developers, Inc. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Turnley v. GarfinkelTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Maples Homeowners Ass'n v. T & R Nashville Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Wheeler v. Southport Seven Planned Unit DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Greig Massey v. R.W. Graf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- Grand Valley Lakes Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Dennis BurrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. Barry Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.