Legal Opinion

Consolidated Mercantile Industries, Inc. v. Hirsch

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

The plaintiff sues successive owners of a building in which he occupied and still occupies as tenant a loft for commercial purposes, to recover rent already paid in excess of the claimed emergency rent and for equitable relief in the form of a modification of the lease so as to reduce the rental thereunder to the claimed emergency rent. The defendants have pleaded four defenses which the plaintiff moves.to strike out for insufficiency.

The first and second defenses rely on a rent arbitration award confirmed by order of this court and on the three months’ limitation prescribed by section 1463…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Heidelberger & CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Skidmore v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Apex Binding Corp. v. RelkinNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Klapp v. DealyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Richardson v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Byrne v. OsiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  2. Finkel v. Carol Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API