Legal Opinion
State v. Eggleston
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1904PublishedCited by 30 opinions
From Multnomah : Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. John Eggleston was convicted of adultery and appeals. For the State there was a brief over the names of Andrew M. Crawford, Attorney General, John Manning, District Attorney, Arthur Spencer, and Robert G. Morrow, with an oral argument by Mr. Morrow.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore
The defendant was tried upon an information the charging part of'which is as follows :
“The said John Eggleston on the 24th day of May, a. d. 1903, in the County of Multnomah and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully and feloniously commit the crime of adultery with a certain female person commonly known by the name of Florence Cline, he the said John Eggleston then and there being a married man and the husband of Alice A. Eggleston, and she, the said Florence Cline, not being his wife, contrary,” etc.
Having been, found guilty thereof, defendant appeals from the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Commonwealth v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. MegordenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Rasnake v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Signs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.