Legal Opinion

Moore v. Manhattan Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1971No. 5487Published

1Opinion of the Court

VEAGLEY, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment against the appellant in a suit brought by appellant for the value of two oriental rugs that she had stored in 1953 with the E. P. Hinkel & Company, Inc.1

The evidence at trial, without a jury, revealed that the appellant and her late husband had stored four oriental rugs with the Hinkel Company in 1953 and thereafter paid the storage charges as bills were received. In February of 1959, unknown to appellant, the Manhattan Company trading *721as Hinkel Rug Cleaning took over the business at that address under a so-called “lease” agreement.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Letta v. Cincinnati Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API