Williams v. Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
Stephanie Williams was injured when she slipped and fell on the wet tile floor at a fast food establishment. A jury verdict was rendered in favor of the restaurant’s owner. On appeal, Williams contends the court committed prejudicial error in refusing to instruct the jury a business proprietor has a duty to either remove a dangerous condition on its premises or warn of its presence. We agree and reverse.
I
The accident occurred on a Friday evening, around the dinner hour. Williams, on a break from her job at the Sears Automotive Center in South Coast Plaza, had gone to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Osborn v. Mission Ready MixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Campbell v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Biles v. Exxon Mobil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Wollersheim v. Church of ScientologyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.