Legal Opinion

Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1923No. 11650PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error to recover a balance due on open account. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

The account sued on was for merchandise furnished the -firm of Philpott .Si Miller, and the defendant Philpott answered that after the filing of the suit he was adjudged a bankrupt in the federal court; that the bankruptcy proceedings were pending at that time; and that there bad been no new promise to pay this indebtedness since the adjudication. The defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Downey v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Bowles v. BifflesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API