Legal Opinion

Downey v. Hicks

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 1853PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLEAN

This case -was brought before us by a writ of error to the Circuit' Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

An action of assumpsit was commenced by the plaintiff, on a note for four hundred and fifty-six dollars, and a large sum for the hire of slaves.

The declaration contained ten counts, to which the defendant pleaded non -assumpsit, the statute of limitations, and payment, on all o. which- issues were joined. ’ The jury “ found for the defendant upon the issues joined as to the within note of four hundred and' fifty-six dollars, and' the within account.” This finding, it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1817

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Mayflower Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. McFadden v. FollrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Ryan v. Security Savings & Commercial BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  4. Shaffer v. Great American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  5. Hobart Nat. Bank v. McMurroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API