Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Casey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 21, 1987No. 62858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice.

This appeal presents a single issue: Did the trial court err in denying appellant’s motion to release judgment under the provisions of 12 O.S.Supp.1983, § 706.B,1 on the grounds that the confirmed plan of reorganization approved by a bankruptcy court did not constitute satisfaction of a state court judgment entered against the individual appellants.

I

In 1981, the Casey Wood Company, a general partnership consisting of appellants, J.P. Casey, J.C. Wood, N.E. Wood, executed promissory notes to the Penn Square Bank. Appellants also signed individual guaranty agreements for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Janeway v. VandeventerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. In the Matter of CONSOLIDATED MOTOR INNS, Debtor, CONSOLIDATED MOTOR INNS, Appellant, v. BVA CREDIT CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. In the Matter of Consolidated Motor Inns, Debtor. Consolidated Motor Inns v. Bva Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API