Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Casey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice.
This appeal presents a single issue: Did the trial court err in denying appellant’s motion to release judgment under the provisions of 12 O.S.Supp.1983, § 706.B,1 on the grounds that the confirmed plan of reorganization approved by a bankruptcy court did not constitute satisfaction of a state court judgment entered against the individual appellants.
I
In 1981, the Casey Wood Company, a general partnership consisting of appellants, J.P. Casey, J.C. Wood, N.E. Wood, executed promissory notes to the Penn Square Bank. Appellants also signed individual guaranty agreements for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Janeway v. VandeventerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- In the Matter of CONSOLIDATED MOTOR INNS, Debtor, CONSOLIDATED MOTOR INNS, Appellant, v. BVA CREDIT CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In the Matter of Consolidated Motor Inns, Debtor. Consolidated Motor Inns v. Bva Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992