Legal Opinion

Heinemann v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2018No. S-17-0161; S-17-0162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Anthony Lee Heinemann, challenges the district court's entry of an order nunc pro tunc correcting two judgments entered against him in 1998. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Appellant presents five issues:

1. Did the Department of Corrections have standing to seek an order nunc pro tunc ?

2. Did the order nunc pro tunc violate Appellant's right to due process of law?

3. Is Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-6-108 a statute of repose, and the only mechanism other than Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-6-106 for reimbursement of public defender fees?

4. Did the State of Wyoming invite the error it now…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Martinez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kite Ranch, LLC v. Powell Family of Yakima, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Christensen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Matter of Marriage of PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. TC & GC v. State (In re L-Mhb)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Devon Energy Production, Lp v. Grayson Mill Operating, LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Ryan Alexander Brown v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Heinemann v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API