Heinemann v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Chief Justice.
[¶1] Appellant, Anthony Lee Heinemann, challenges the district court's entry of an order nunc pro tunc correcting two judgments entered against him in 1998. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Appellant presents five issues:
1. Did the Department of Corrections have standing to seek an order nunc pro tunc ?
2. Did the order nunc pro tunc violate Appellant's right to due process of law?
3. Is Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-6-108 a statute of repose, and the only mechanism other than Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-6-106 for reimbursement of public defender fees?
4. Did the State of Wyoming invite the error it now…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Martinez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Kite Ranch, LLC v. Powell Family of Yakima, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Christensen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of Marriage of PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- TC & GC v. State (In re L-Mhb)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Devon Energy Production, Lp v. Grayson Mill Operating, LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Ryan Alexander Brown v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Heinemann v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019