Legal Opinion
Euclid Holding Co. v. Kermacoe Realty Co.
New York City Court
Decided February 16, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosalsky, J.
This is a summary proceeding for non-payment of rent. It is brought by the owner in fee against the tenant and assignee of the tenant, to recover possession of two apartment houses situate within the territorial jurisdiction of this court.
*467On November 1, 1925, the landlord and the Van Dyck Holding Corporation entered into a written lease of said premises. The term was for twenty-one years, renewable at the tenant’s option until the year 2030. The tenant covenanted during the year 1927 to pay the rent of $185,000 in quarter-annual installments in advance, and also the taxes as they became…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In re Sherwoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Chaude v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- In re BannerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907
- In re AtlasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Stamford National Bank & Trust Co v. PierceNew York City Court · 1937
- Goodman v. Schached, New York County Courts1932
- Haskel v. 60 West 53 St. Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1929
- Park Holding Co. v. JohnsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980